🔀Traditional Bridges vs. Intent-Based Swaps
Scalability
Limited by locked TVL, leading to bottlenecks
Access to a global liquidity network, infinitely scalable
Slippage & MEV
Prone to slippage and MEV front-running attacks
Zero slippage, immune to MEV exploitation
Security
Centralized TVL pools create honeypot risks
No locked TVL, minimizing security vulnerabilities
User Experience (UX)
Slow transaction speeds, high gas fees
Ultra-fast swaps, no wait for network finality
Liquidity Requirements
Requires heavy incentives to attract liquidity
No need for liquidity bootstrapping or incentives
Why Intent-Based Swaps Are Better 🏅
Intent-based swaps revolutionize cross-chain transactions by eliminating the traditional limitations of bridges. They prioritize security, efficiency, and user experience, making them the future of blockchain interoperability.
Last updated