🔀Traditional Bridges vs. Intent-Based Swaps

Feature	Traditional Bridges 🏗️	Intent-Based Swaps ⚡
Scalability	Limited by locked TVL, leading to bottlenecks	Access to a global liquidity network, infinitely scalable
Slippage & MEV	Prone to slippage and MEV front-running attacks	Zero slippage, immune to MEV exploitation
Security	Centralized TVL pools create honeypot risks	No locked TVL, minimizing security vulnerabilities
User Experience (UX)	Slow transaction speeds, high gas fees	Ultra-fast swaps, no wait for network finality
Liquidity Requirements	Requires heavy incentives to attract liquidity	No need for liquidity bootstrapping or incentives

Why Intent-Based Swaps Are Better 🏅

Intent-based swaps revolutionize cross-chain transactions by eliminating the traditional limitations of bridges. They prioritize security, efficiency, and user experience, making them the future of blockchain interoperability.